School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences

Research Ethical Guidelines




In keeping with directives from the European Union and from the UK Government, universities are required to put in place ethics procedures and guidelines for research. In addition, research councils including EPSRC are now asking for formal ethics approval of proposals in some of their funded programmes.


Heriot-Watt University has established a University Ethics Committee to guide schools, monitor procedures and ensure appropriate ethical issues are being considered. The committee has asked schools to submit ethical approval procedures relevant to their research activities. As a consequence, a MACS Research Ethics committee has been formed. Its scope includes research and student projects.


This note outlines the context and provides a standard protocol for ethics approval for research proposals.


General Ethical Principles


  1. Obligations to society:- for example, conforming with responsible, moral and legal practice; maintenance of high scientific standards and impartial assessment and dissemination of findings.

  2. Obligations to funders and employers:- the relationship between researchers, funders, and employer should be clear and balanced without compromise to morality, the law or professional integrity.

  3. Obligations to colleagues:- the maintenance of standards and appropriate professional behaviour with methods, procedures and findings open to review.



Ethical principles for research involving human participants


One major obligation on the part of researchers which is not included in the above list is to the participants who are involved in research. Social researchers must strive to protect participants from undue harm arising as a consequence of their participation in research. This requires that their participation should be voluntary, and as fully informed as possible. At the same time, no group should be disadvantaged by routinely being excluded from consideration. Participants should also be aware of their entitlement to refuse to participate at any stage for whatever reason, and to withdraw data just supplied. Special considerations should be given to studies requiring informed consent from vulnerable participants. Such groups include children, those with an intellectual disability and those in a dependent relationship to the researcher or commissioning body (for example, students in the University or patients in a hospital).


a) For interviews / focus groups:



b) Questionnaires: All written questionnaires must have an opening statement informing the participant of the nature and purpose of the research. If a questionnaire contains any questions likely to cause offence to the respondent, this should be clearly indicated on the front cover, so that the participant may decide not to read on. Completion of the forms shall indicate evidence of informed consent.


c) Observational methods: Where behaviour patterns are observed without the participants’ knowledge, researchers should take care not to infringe the privacy of an individual or group. Where practical, an attempt should be made to obtain consent post hoc. Cultural variations in what constitutes public and private space should be acknowledged.


d) Photography: Photographing human participants in publicly accessible spaces is a legitimate research tool. However; if prejudicial to the participants’ interests or reputation, identifying features of the participant must be obscured.


e)Experimental or field testing of participants: Ethical requirements for this situation are the same as for those applying to participant interviews.


f) Withholding information from participants: If it is essential to the design of an experiment, questionnaire or interview that some information about its purpose is withheld from participants (e.g. because this knowledge would influence their behaviour), then full information must be provided when participants are debriefed and they must be given the opportunity to withdraw their data. Experiments of this kind should not be conducted if it is likely that participants will react to debriefing with discomfort, anger or objections.


More detailed reference documents are available which provide useful further guidance on these issues, notably, the Social Research Association’s Ethical Guidelines, and the BPS ethical code at www.bps.org.uk/documents/Code.pdf.

School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences

Protocol for Ethics Approval



  1. Title of research: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


  1. Purpose of study:
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



  1. Is ethical approval required by another body linked to the research?


Yes

No


If YES please attach copies of the approval given to the other body, and confirmation that no changes have been made to the protocol since approval was granted



  1. Is permission required from another body to use data or research materials?


Yes

No


If YES please attach copies



  1. Does the research involve the use of human subjects:

Yes

No


If YES what is the nature of the research e.g. focus group, questionnaire, etc

If NO please go to Q.13


N.B. The researcher should have considered the use of secondary data sources and should be clear that the aims of research cannot be met without new primary research involving people.



  1. Is written consent to be obtained? Yes

No

If YES please attach a copy of the consent and information form or indicate when it will be supplied.

If NO please justify.


  1. How long will a subject have to decide whether to take part in the study.


Time in days

If less than 1 day, please comment.

(Note that it is common in the case of face to face interviews not to give significant advanced notice. This is acceptable in view of maximising the response rates and reliability of some survey based research.)

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


  1. Will any of the subjects be from one of the following vulnerable groups?:


Children under 18 (16 in Scotland) Yes No

People with learning difficulties Yes No

Patients in hospital Yes No

Other vulnerable groups (e.g. mental illness, dementia) Yes No


9. If any box in 7 is ticked, what special arrangements have been made to deal with issues of consent for the subjects (e.g. consent from parents, professional carer, relevant institution, etc).


________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


10. Are there any potential physical, psychological or disclosure dangers that can be anticipated from involvement in the research? Yes

No


If yes, please give details.


11. What steps will be taken to safeguard the confidentiality and anonymity of subjects?





  1. Does the study design involve actively deceiving participants?

Yes

No


If yes, briefly describe the nature of the deception and explain why it is necessary


13. Does the research project comply with the requirements of current Data Protection legislation (for example, data storage and security.), including in relation to the use and (non-) disclosure of secondary data sets?


________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



14. Is your risk assessment of the health and safety implications for staff of the research

Low or negligible

Medium

High


If medium or high please ensure that the health and safety officer in the school is informed.





Please sign the following:



I as a Principal Investigator (supervisor) have checked the above for accuracy and am satisfied the information provided is a true reflection of the intended study.


Name (please print) ________________________________________


Signature ________________________________________


Date ________________________________________



I am satisfied that the researcher has properly considered the ethical implications of the intended study and has taken appropriate action.


_________________________________________________ (Director of Research)



Date ________________________________________